Jump to content
NAKIVO Community Forum

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 02/29/24 in Posts

  1. Yes, native support for Proxmox VMs is under investigation. However, you can already use agent-based backup for Proxmox. This should allow you to back up and recover Proxmox data the way you would back up your Windows or Linux machines. We’ll share the workflow here soon. Stay tuned!
    6 points
  2. Does anyone know if NAKIVO is planning to support Proxmox backup? I'm looking for an alternative to the built-in Proxmox Backup Server
    5 points
  3. Darn, was hoping to test it out already . The native backups in PVE are okay but lacking some key features.
    5 points
  4. Dear @Argon, Thank you for your honest feedback. This helps us understand what our users need and how to improve our product moving forward. We have tried to be as clear as possible that this is only an agent-based approach to backing up Proxmox VE, and wanted to inform users who may not be aware of this approach in NAKIVO Backup & Replication. As for the native Backup Server Tool, it may have some advantages but it lacks several important capabilities such as multiple backup targets (for example, cloud) or recovery options (for example, granular recovery of app objects). We are continuously working on improving our software solution, and we are investigating native Proxmox support. Thank you once again for your input. Best regards
    4 points
  5. We’re excited to announce that NAKIVO has expanded the range of supported platforms to include Proxmox VE:
    4 points
  6. I asked the NAKIVO sales team about Proxmox support recently. They said native support is on their roadmap but no ETA yet.
    4 points
  7. Hi, I have a problem, apparently of incompatibility of versions, I am working on the most recent version of nakivo, that is 10.11 and I have two nas devices, one with transporter version 10.8 and another with version 10.5, when I try to add them to the nodes, I get the following error. My solution is to downgrade the version to 10.8 or similar, but I can't find the resources on the official website. Could you help me get past versions of nakivo? If you guys have any other solution ideas or suggestions, I'm open to trying.
    2 points
  8. Hello @Ana Jaas, thanks for reaching out. To be able to provide the steps to take, we need more information about your NAS devices. Could you please provide us with the specifications of your NAS devices? We'll need details such as the model, operating system version, and CPU version. This information will enable us to guide you through updating the Transporter to match the version of the Director. Alternatively, you can navigate to Expert Mode: https://helpcenter.nakivo.com/User-Guide/Content/Settings/Expert-Mode.htm?Highlight=expert mode and enable system.transporter.allow.old to address the compatibility issue. If you find these steps challenging or would prefer direct assistance, we're more than willing to schedule a remote session to help you navigate through the process: support@nakivo.com. Looking forward to your response.
    2 points
  9. Thanks, I really, appreciate your aportatation, for this problem and I have resolved. Again, thak you.
    1 point
  10. Of course... Device model: DS1621+ CPU: AMD Ryzen 1500B
    1 point
  11. I sincerely hope that you can fully support Proxmox. I would prefer to use a Nakivo solution (which has satisfied us for a long time on ESX) rather than switching to Competitor.
    1 point
  12. Hello, thanks for answering... I was able to upload a transporter version on my QNAP device, it worked and is currently working. I tried to do the same with the sysnology transporter, download the updater and upload it for manual installation, but the following text box appeared... "This package requires DSM 7.0-40000 or later." My sysnology device has dsm 7.2.1 update 4. I think this error should not appear on my DSM version is within the DSM range that appears in the message. The updater that I downloaded is from the official nakivo website. I downloaded and tried two updaters and with both I got the same message. Sysnology Transporter package. Sysnology ARMv7 Transporter package. Help me pleaseeeee :(
    1 point
  13. Hi Guys I'm having trouble exporting settings from Nakivo 10.2 and importing to version 10.11. I would like to reinstall version 10.2 to perform this action, but I can't find any repository of old versions. Is there no possibility to download previous versions of Nakivo?
    1 point
  14. Hi guys. I've been searching for a few days and I can't find any reference to this error. I'm trying to import the configuration of a Nakivo 10.2 server to a new installation with Nakivo 10.11. Thanks.
    1 point
  15. Hi, Is agentless support coming as well? Large clusters can't use agent-based backups due to multiple VLANs, etc.
    1 point
  16. I am encountering a significant issue with a "Clone Backup to Backblaze" job that I've set up. The task is designed to transfer all my backups, totaling 1.4 TB, to Backblaze using a 275mbit/s internet connection. Based on my calculations, I anticipated the job would complete within 13-14 hours. However, after 43 hours and 30 minutes, the progress is only at 88.5%. Initially, the transfer rate peaks between 200-300mbit/s, which aligns with my expectations. But, a few hours into the job, the speed dramatically drops to as low as 0.01 mbit/s and stays minimal for extended periods, vastly underutilizing my available bandwidth as confirmed by speedtest.net results. Additionally, there's a scheduling conflict that exacerbates the situation. While the "Clone Backup to Backblaze" job is ongoing, the original backup process starts, writing data to the same source targeted by the clone job. I've tried to mitigate this by scheduling the clone job to run over the weekend, ensuring it has ample time to complete before the original backup resumes on Monday. Despite these adjustments, the issue persists. Could you please provide guidance or solutions to address the following concerns? The drastic fluctuations in data transfer speed, particularly the periods of significantly reduced speed. Strategies to prevent scheduling conflicts between the clone and original backup jobs, ensuring both can complete without interference. Thank you for your assistance.
    1 point
  17. Live Webinar: The Ultimate Guide to VM Backup and Recovery with NAKIVO Special Offer for Attendees *Attend the webinar and get a chance to win: $50 Amazon eGift Card in one of three lucky draws during the webinar. $25 Amazon eGift Card for completing a quick post-webinar survey. Learn more Protecting data in virtual environments requires a thorough understanding of potential threats and vulnerabilities and a dedicated data protection solution for virtualized workloads. Register for our upcoming webinar, where we discuss the threat landscape and best practices you need to protect your VMs. Discover how NAKIVO backup for virtualization platforms can provide the optimal solution for your data protection needs. What it covers: Overview: Potential threats to virtual environments Tools: NAKIVO backup for virtualization platforms Tips: Best practices for data protection in virtual environments. Real-life Scenarios: Case studies of customers achieving their VM data protection goals. Technical Demo: Showcasing NAKIVO Backup & Replication capabilities for virtual workload protection. Q&A session: Insights from experts in virtual environment protection. When to attend Tuesday, March 5, 2024 Americas: 11 AM – 12 PM EST EMEA: 5 PM – 6 PM CET REGISTER NOW *Terms and conditions apply
    1 point
  18. I really like Nakivo but your support for Proxmox is shameful. You do not support Proxmox, you just suggest that we install your Linux agent on it, which has in fact been compatible for a long time since it is a Debian Linux and which involves making a backup of the entire system in his outfit. Are you riding the wind of industry panic with VMWare? This does not support HV Proxmox and this backup should be classified under physical backup of a linux host. But the worst thing is to say that this way of doing things is better than Proxmox Backup Server... I believe that you have not studied the competitor very well before trying to sell your product as "compatible". Your solution does not at all allow you to make a serious backup of VMs and CTs independently of the HV.
    0 points
×
×
  • Create New...