opk.giandomenico

Theese are info about qcow files failed to consolidate on proxmox. 043c65d6-b6f5-4f39-b27d-74ac7c31eb1a.qcow2 7f552c38-ead4-4221-b94e-760aa06f0901.qcow2 root@prxtichos:/opt/nakivo/bptmp# qemu-img info 043c65d6-b6f5-4f39-b27d-74ac7c31eb1a.qcow2 image: 043c65d6-b6f5-4f39-b27d-74ac7c31eb1a.qcow2 file format: qcow2 virtual size: 50 GiB (53687091200 bytes) disk size: 64.5 KiB cluster_size: 65536 backing file: /dev/zvol/ssd_pool/vm-100-disk-1 backing file format: raw Format specific information: compat: 1.1 compression type: zlib lazy refcounts: false refcount bits: 16 corrupt: false extended l2: false Child node '/file': filename: 043c65d6-b6f5-4f39-b27d-74ac7c31eb1a.qcow2 protocol type: file file length: 640 KiB (655360 bytes) disk size: 64.5 KiB root@prxtichos:/opt/nakivo/bptmp# qemu-img info 7f552c38-ead4-4221-b94e-760aa06f0901.qcow2 image: 7f552c38-ead4-4221-b94e-760aa06f0901.qcow2 file format: qcow2 virtual size: 50 GiB (53687091200 bytes) disk size: 64.5 KiB cluster_size: 65536 backing file: /dev/zvol/ssd_pool/vm-100-disk-1 backing file format: raw Format specific information: compat: 1.1 compression type: zlib lazy refcounts: false refcount bits: 16 corrupt: false extended l2: false Child node '/file': filename: 7f552c38-ead4-4221-b94e-760aa06f0901.qcow2 protocol type: file file length: 640 KiB (655360 bytes) disk size: 64.5 KiB This is the nakivo error: My question is, i have to consolidate the most recent file because the are 2 overlay file.

Hello, i have a consolidation error on a proxmox environment, i have 2 overlay files to consolidate on the same vm, i think that i have to consolidate the most recent one. What i have to do with the the older overlay file? could i remove it is there a best practice to follow and avoid data corruption? Best regards

Are they indipendent to VM Versionon proxmo: example: i run proxmox 9.11 my vm are configured on 9.1 hardware version could this cause issue? thank you in advance, best regards.

Hello, i'm setting up a backup for active directory dc VM Usually on other Backup Solution for application aware processing an admin account is needed for the aware application to work. But seems that there's no need on nakivo because the agent does all the work. Is this configuration correct or i'm missing something? Best regards

Hello, i've updated Nakivo from 11.1 to .2 everything has been completed successfully without any errors. I've tried to start a backup jobs and noticed that transporters hasn't been updated, they are still at the previous version. Now, i've rolled back with snapshot to a previous versione, but how this could be fixed ?

Hello, i'm using Nakivo on proxmox since november. I wish to know how the logic works when backupping vm on THICK LVM. Does nakivo backup directly the vm, or works like other backup software snapshotting and backupping the vm. I've saw also that writes in /tmp but the files written there are just few mb(depending on the backupped vm) Thank you in advance