Jump to content
NAKIVO Community Forum

Simon

Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Simon

  1. 1 hour ago, Mario said:

    Hi Simon

    I agree with official Moderator, it also depends on the CPU power of the included devices.
    Are you sending from a Server or Nas to a Server or Nas?
    At the beginnign I was using the Transporter on the Synology Nas, but this was a bottleneck.
    Now I use whenever the HpyerV/ESX as Transporter and att the storage over SMB. This has increased the processing speed.

    Mario
     

    So if I understand this right, you're installing the full Nakivo Windows installation on the Hyper-V server and then backing up to the NAS as a mapped drive?

    • Like 1
  2. Hi,

    When you say the speed of 'read' and 'write' what do you mean? These are Synology units and the local backup to the drives gets about 130 MB/s

    What is odd is that the speed in the 'speedometer' varies so much. Can you explain what this is showing and whether you'd expect it to fluctuate?

     

    image.thumb.png.1f2793953da1e8159a3ef066ae92afff.png

    Here the speed is down at Zero with the job still running, but a few moments ago it was at 40 MB/s - is that right?

    • Like 1
  3. What sort of transfer speed are others getting on backup copy jobs across WAN links?

    I'm setting up the repositories as FAST compression and Network Acceleration enabled and I'm getting between 3 MB/s and at best 15 MBps. The latter is with the source on a 50/50 leased line and the target on a 200/200 FTTP.

     

    • Like 1
  4. We are still trying to catch up on one site but the others are mostly OK now. One has a corrupted repository and we'll probably just junk it and start again over the weekend.

    We were originally told it didn't matter if you have mismatched revisions but it seems it does. Now being encouraged to move to 9.2 but that's not going to happen any time soon.

     

  5. We are taking backups of a Hyper-V server and after the initial backup, the daily backups have settled to a regular pattern of what has changed - at around 25GB per day.

    But we then have a backup copy job to copy these backups offsite. This works, but the backup copy job shows as increasing in size every day - so it's now 151GB and taking all night. Surely it should only be copying what's changed.

    The remote site is a Synology NAS running 9.1 as transporter only.

    2020-02-14_18h09_15.png

    2020-02-14_18h11_25.png

×
×
  • Create New...